Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jack Draper vs Illya Marchenko Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Draper vs Marchenko analysis and find out who is favored!
Jack Draper vs Illya Marchenko Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Draper 1 - 0 Marchenko
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Draper has won 50% of points on their second serve, while Marchenko has won 50.35%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Draper, in recent form, has won 51.56% of their opponent's second serve points, while Marchenko has won 44.92%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.1% and 30.5% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Draper has saved 57.43% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marchenko has saved 62.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Draper has won 64.29% of matches played (W/L 36/ 20), with Marchenko winning 59.68% (W/L 37/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Draper has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 76% (W/L 72/ 23), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 9/ 11). Marchenko has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 231/ 136), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 63/ 84).
- Player level: In the last year, Draper has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 65.22% of matches (W/L 15/ 8), where as Marchenko has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.75% of matches (W/L 32/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Draper winning 1 times and Marchenko being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Draper winning 2 and Marchenko winning 0. The last match between Draper and Marchenko was at the St. Brieuc Challenger, 30-03-2022, First, I.hard with Jack Draper getting the victory 6-3 7-6(3).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:34:20.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Draper and Marchenko have played a deciding set 0 times, with Draper winning 0 times and Marchenko 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Draper winning 1, and Marchenko 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Draper has played against opponents with an average rank of 158.91 while Marchenko has played against players with an average rank of 314.11.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Draper has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marchenko has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Draper has converted 47.25% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marchenko has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
39
Rank
35
High
22
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
216
Rank
49
High
36
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
68% (202-94)
Career Total W/L
57% (602-447)
52% (13-12)
YTD W/L
38% (8-13)
$1,468,300
Career Prize Money
$1,217,273
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jack Draper | Illya Marchenko |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:20 | 1:34:20 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (38/62) | 55% (32/58) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 87% (33/38) | 81% (26/32) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 67% (16/24) | 62% (16/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Points W% | 28% (16/58) | 21% (13/62) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Jack Draper
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
6
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
5
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
26 of
32)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
13 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
16 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jack Draper | Illya Marchenko |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (13/12) | 38% (8/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (37/32) | 41% (21/30) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (352/310) | 48% (242/266) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (9/6) | 40% (6/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.54 | 0.47 |
| Aces Total | 174 | 116 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 75 | 61 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:7:58 | 1:57:40 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 102.8 | 267.95 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (1148/2000) | 56% (939/1662) |
| 1st Serve W% | 76% (870/1148) | 70% (659/939) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (426/852) | 50% (364/723) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (86/182) | 33% (47/141) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (777/2052) | 36% (586/1633) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 64% (9/5) | 33% (1/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 41% (7/10) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (12/21) | 38% (8/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 38% (5/13) |
| Deciding Set W% | 42% (5/12) | 44% (4/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 73% (15/11) | 75% (8/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 27% (15/4) | 25% (8/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 15% (13/2) |
Jack Draper Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jack Draper
50%
(
77 of
154)
1st Serve %
50%
(
75 of
149)
11
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
9
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
51 of
75)
52%
(
40 of
77)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
90%
(
9 of
10)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
37%
(
57 of
154)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
60 of
149)
157
Total Points Won
146
|
7-5 6-4 6-7(3) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Jack Draper
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
6
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
23 of
28)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
30 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
57)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Jack Draper
50%
(
35 of
70)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
66)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Borna Coric
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
92%
(
35 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
8 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Jack Draper
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
43%
(
26 of
61)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Thanasi Kokkinakis
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
6
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
43 of
52)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
20 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Jack Draper
78%
(
75 of
96)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
18
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
60 of
75)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
46 of
60)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
24%
(
23 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
28 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Rudolf Molleker
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Vit Kopriva
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Jack Draper
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
34 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
98)
94
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Illya Marchenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Illya Marchenko
66%
(
76 of
116)
1st Serve %
53%
(
46 of
87)
17
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
37%
(
43 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
52%
(
53 of
101)
1st Serve %
74%
(
66 of
89)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
46 of
66)
50%
(
24 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
9%
(
1 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
97
|
0-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Max Purcell
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Evgeny Donskoy
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
94)
9
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Hiroki Moriya
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Illya Marchenko
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Illya Marchenko
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
15
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
26 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
76)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Illya Marchenko
44%
(
24 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Illya Marchenko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
67)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Illya Marchenko
47%
(
48 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
111)
8
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
7
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
110
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Draper Vs Marchenko Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
